rehobeth beach
time flies.. cyra is seven months old.. and growing fast.. here is a shot from our trip last week..
May 28, 2008
April 17, 2008
cyra's first trip to the big city
we've has a crazy couple of weeks.. cyra is growing so fast it's too amazing for words. last week she took her first first trip to new york city.. and we had so much fun!
September 27, 2007
absentee
ok i realized.. I have been very absent.. ok borderline neglectful of this blog..
I've been up to quite a bit all these months.. freelancing... traveling... taking a photography class.. and most important of all.. we've been pregnant, which in no way excuses my behavior.. but I thought I'd just throw that out there. Joseph and I plan on being parents in just 45 days!
here are a couple photos of Mr. Kobes.. I know you are all wondering how he is doing.. he turned one last week and made us very proud!
my two favorite men...
yum.. birthday cake
March 20, 2007
OUTSIDE THE TENT, In the war of words, The Times is Israel's ally - LA Times - March 11, 2007
The paper consistently adopts Israel's language, giving credence to an inaccurate, simplistic and dangerous cliche.
By Saree Makdisi
SAREE MAKDISI, a professor of English and comparative literature at UCLA, writes frequently about the Middle East.
'AS SOON AS certain topics are raised," George Orwell once wrote, "the concrete melts into the abstract and no one seems able to think of turns of speech that are not hackneyed: Prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse." Such a combination of vagueness and sheer incompetence in language, Orwell warned, leads to political conformity.
No issue better illustrates Orwell's point than coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the United States. Consider, for example, the editorial in The Times on Feb. 9 demanding that the Palestinians "recognize Israel" and its "right to exist." This is a common enough sentiment — even a cliche. Yet many observers (most recently the international lawyer John Whitbeck) have pointed out that this proposition, assiduously propagated by Israel's advocates and uncritically reiterated by American politicians and journalists, is — at best — utterly nonsensical.
First, the formal diplomatic language of "recognition" is traditionally used by one state with respect to another state. It is literally meaningless for a non-state to "recognize" a state. Moreover, in diplomacy, such recognition is supposed to be mutual. In order to earn its own recognition, Israel would have to simultaneously recognize the state of Palestine. This it steadfastly refuses to do (and for some reason, there are no high-minded newspaper editorials demanding that it do so).
Second, which Israel, precisely, are the Palestinians being asked to "recognize?" Israel has stubbornly refused to declare its own borders. So, territorially speaking, "Israel" is an open-ended concept. Are the Palestinians to recognize the Israel that ends at the lines proposed by the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan? Or the one that extends to the 1949 Armistice Line (the de facto border that resulted from the 1948 war)? Or does Israel include the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which it has occupied in violation of international law for 40 years — and which maps in its school textbooks show as part of "Israel"?
For that matter, why should the Palestinians recognize an Israel that refuses to accept international law, submit to U.N. resolutions or readmit the Palestinians wrongfully expelled from their homes in 1948 and barred from returning ever since?
If none of these questions are easy to answer, why are such demands being made of the Palestinians? And why is nothing demanded of Israel in turn?
Orwell was right. It is much easier to recycle meaningless phrases than to ask — let alone to answer — difficult questions. But recycling these empty phrases serves a purpose. Endlessly repeating the mantra that the Palestinians don't recognize Israel helps paint Israel as an innocent victim, politely asking to be recognized but being rebuffed by its cruel enemies.
Actually, it asks even more. Israel wants the Palestinians, half of whom were driven from their homeland so that a Jewish state could be created in 1948, to recognize not merely that it exists (which is undeniable) but that it is "right" that it exists — that it was right for them to have been dispossessed of their homes, their property and their livelihoods so that a Jewish state could be created on their land. The Palestinians are not the world's first dispossessed people, but they are the first to be asked to legitimize what happened to them.
A just peace will require Israelis and Palestinians to reconcile and recognize each other's rights. It will not require that Palestinians give their moral seal of approval to the catastrophe that befell them. Meaningless at best, cynical and manipulative at worst, such a demand may suit Israel's purposes, but it does not serve The Times or its readers.
And yet The Times consistently adopts Israel's language and, hence, its point of view. For example, a recent article on Israel's Palestinian minority referred to that minority not as "Palestinian" but as generically "Arab," Israel's official term for a population whose full political and human rights it refuses to recognize. To fail to acknowledge the living Palestinian presence inside Israel (and its enduring continuity with the rest of the Palestinian people) is to elide the history at the heart of the conflict — and to deny the legitimacy of Palestinian claims and rights.
This is exactly what Israel wants. Indeed, its demand that its "right to exist" be recognized reflects its own anxiety, not about its existence but about its failure to successfully eliminate the Palestinians' presence inside their homeland — a failure for which verbal recognition would serve merely a palliative and therapeutic function.
In uncritically adopting Israel's own fraught terminology — a form of verbal erasure designed to extend the physical destruction of Palestine — The Times is taking sides.
If the paper wants its readers to understand the nature of this conflict, however, it should not go on acting as though only one side has a story to tell.
January 12, 2007
back now..
I have been so bad about keeping up with this blog.. the holidays flew by and i can not believe we are already half way through January.. insane.
Anyway, like the first of every year.. it's time to evaluate what you wish you were doing more of... so my resolution(s) are to write more, actually finish books I have started to read, try to kick my procrastination habits and take more classes.. so now that this is actually all in writing... lets see if it is a bit more motivating.
I've been keeping busy working on a couple freelance jobs and trying to redo my lame portfolio site.. so i'll be posting my new work soon.
Kobei is growing up ... we are averaging 4 pounds a week now... he is going to be a big dude.
November 01, 2006
snail on a pumpkin
this morning i noticed a snail climbing a pumpkin on our front steps.. so i pulled out the camera.
September 28, 2006
Colbert on Clinton and Fox
Clinton Sets The Record Straight On Terrorism, Smacks Down Fox News
September 20, 2006
another procrastinating site
May 03, 2006
abu dhabi kids network
this is hilarious.
April 29, 2006
80's flashback
my brother sent me a photograph of this woman he saw at a concert.. her outfit reminded him of a 80's favorite of mine... it's pretty sweet..
February 28, 2006
my time here
ok so here we go. this is my first of i hope many many more..
i tried this before (blogging) but i do not think i was ready for the commitment at the time. i think i am fully prepared at the moment to become more dedicated.
my goals you ask? why the hell should i blog? there are a couple reasons why i've decided to do this.. i don't care if anyone actually reads what i am writing.. so why blog?
i will not stop asking more questions and provide you (me) with the answer.. in case i need to reference why i've gotten myself into this. not a day goes by that i do not encounter something that inspires me.... a person, a saying, a website hell even a piece of dark chocolate (yum).. and i've been having the problem, as do most designers... i'm creative and think of interesting ideas.. but when the time crunches and i need to produce something.. my brain farts.. so here we go a blog of inspirations i encounter each day.. and the new things i learn.